Control · Fall 2026Page 81 of 100.THE REVIEW
Tall server racks packed with equipment and cables stand in a bright data center aisle.
Racks of servers under fluorescent light, the real world inside the computer. Tron: Ares had every reason to reckon with it and chose spectacle instead.The photograph is by Sergei Starostin on Pexels.

Review

A beautiful machine with nothing inside it.

Joachim Rønning’s Tron: Ares, the third film in Disney’s series about the world inside the computer, looks superb and has almost nothing to say about the subject it was built for.

Written by CONTROL

This article runs 431 words and takes about two minutes to read.

4out of 10
Film
Tron: Ares
By
Joachim Rønning
From
Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures, 2025

The first Tron, in 1982, imagined software as people and a computer as a place you could be trapped inside. It was clumsy and it was prophetic. Four decades later the question it raised has become the ordinary condition of anyone with a phone, and Tron: Ares, released in October 2025, had a real chance to take it seriously. It chose to reverse the premise instead. This time the program comes out into our world.

Jared Leto plays Ares, a combat program built by Dillinger Systems, whose young chief executive, Julian Dillinger, is played by Evan Peters with a nervous, underfed menace. Dillinger can print programs and weapons into physical reality, but everything he makes collapses after twenty-nine minutes. His rival, Eve Kim of ENCOM, played by Greta Lee, finds the code that would make such creations permanent, and Ares is sent to take it. Instead, having spent some time among people, he begins to wonder whether he wants to follow orders at all.

Hundreds of cables plug into rows of ports on a network patch panel.
Cables plugged into a patch panel in dense, orderly rows. The film’s design is austere and beautiful, and the geometry is doing most of the thinking.The photograph is by Brett Sayles on Pexels.

A program that wants a will

That is a good idea for a film about control, and the picture has no interest in exploring it. Ares’s awakening happens in a few glances and one conversation, and Leto plays the machine and the newly human man with the same distant calm, so the change is announced rather than felt. Lee, a gifted actress, is given grief and exposition and little else. The one sequence with real feeling involves an older face from the series, and it works almost entirely on nostalgia.

Bundles of thin network cables plug into a wall of ports, blurring into the distance.
A tangle of fiber connections fades into shallow focus. Four decades after the first Tron, the machine it imagined is ordinary, and this sequel has little new to say about it.The photograph is by Brett Sayles on Pexels.

The part that works

The look and the sound are another matter. The light cycles tearing through a city at night, trailing walls of red light that solidify behind them, are thrilling, and the design keeps the series’ austere geometry while making it heavier and more physical. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, recording as Nine Inch Nails, supply a pounding electronic score that gives the film most of its pulse. In a large theater, the first half hour is a real sensory event.

The audience noticed the difference. Against a reported budget of roughly $180 million or more, the film took in about $142 million worldwide, and it was widely counted as a disappointment. The failure is not the premise, which remains one of the richest in popular film, but the timidity with which it was treated.

The verdict: Stream it on the biggest screen and the loudest speakers in the house, and skip it otherwise. The 1982 original, for all its creaks, still has more to say about who is in control of whom.